The Recovery of the Arts

By Jonathan Pageau on June 4, 2012
  1. The Recovery of the Arts
  2. The Recovery of the Arts (pt.2): From the Garden to the City
  3. The Recovery of The Arts (pt.3): Memory of the Heart


(This post is the first of a series of three.  Part 2.  Part 3)

We would like to welcome you to the Orthodox Arts Journal. We hope that this space will be a tribute to a skill and a form of making that reveals the Kingdom of God around us. We hope it will be a catalyst for the rediscovering and the flourishing of the best Orthodox examples of all the Arts. But before we start, we must admit that “art” is a fickle notion, one that deserves a bit of attention at the outset. It has come to invoke all sorts of mental images and an unending debate of what it is or is not. Through this, the Romantic view of art still prevails in popular perception.  Art is seen as an emotive and individual expression. We often identify the artist to that unstable individual who creates out of disordered passion, such as a Van Gogh.  Art has also gained idolatrous proportions in having become “an end in itself”. The most educated person will believe without flinching that art should be made “for arts sake”, as if art was the Infinite or the Good itself. We wish to take a short trip into the notion of art, of its genesis and development and how it can relate to the Church. We will revisit its modern incarnation at the end of our text.

The origin of the word “art” is Latin relating to a form of applied knowledge, a skill, a craft. It is workmanship. In the same manner, its Greek equivalent techne has similar roots. Techne is a form of knowledge of principles that is turned toward doing. In the ancient world, art and craft (or technologies) were not separated the way they are now, but rather techne was a more encompassing notion that was attributed to any form of applied knowledge. As such, it was often opposed to episteme, which is “pure” knowledge. In certain respects it was looked down upon by the philosophers as a low form of imitation, a kind of “dead matter”.

Just as with the ancient Greeks, in the Biblical tradition there is a similar suspicion attributed to craft (even notwithstanding image-making). It is not to be ignored that the “crafts” were invented by the sons of Cain – building of cities, the handling of musical instruments, metallurgy and general artifice. This is taken even further in extra-Biblical traditions, such as in the Enochian traditions where the fallen angels are said to teach men all sorts of crafts, especially necromancy and the general ornamentation of the body. Techne as a kind of modification of nature is thus equated with perversion of nature. Its development is seen as an acceleration of the fall and so techne holds death by the hand. In the Enochian tradition, one could even say that it is partially techne which brought about the flood!

Similarly, one must not forget that the building of Solomon’s Temple is very much intertwined with notions of the foreigner, with all the negative connotations this can have in the Bible. The great artisan who built the liturgical objects in the first Temple was half Hebrew, as his father was from Tyre. All the materials and many of the workers for the Temple were sent from Hiram, the king of Tyre. The text makes great efforts to show that all the labour for the temple was accomplished by enslaved foreigners in Israel. Further, pasted in the midst of the descriptions of all the objects Solomon had made for himself is the story of the queen of Sheba, followed by the lament of how Solomon married foreign women.  In the text of 1 Kings there is a very strong hint to what we are meant to understand, because this man, this splendid half-Israelite craftsman from Tyre is called a “great artificer”. The word used for artificer is the same as is used to describe Tubal-Cain, the descendent of Cain who invented metallurgy (and who according to tradition killed Cain).  It is the only other place in the Bible where this word appears in this manner. And so there is a mystery, the mystery of death itself.

The mystery is great indeed. For who is this alien, this foreigner that builds the temple o f God?  Colossians 1, that great text which we will revisit over and over to find the source of the sacramental reality of the Church gives us the answer. It is we. For Saint Paul tells us that: “… you, who once were alienated and enemies in your mind by wicked works, yet now He has reconciled in the body of His flesh through death, to present you holy, and blameless, and above reproach in His sight.”  For the Christian, death itself has been changed into the reconciliation of the alienated, of the foreigner both in a spiritual and literal sense.

And so what then is the role of techne?

Martin Heidegger comments on Aristotle and Plato,

“Techne is a mode of aletheuein (unveiling, truth).  …Whoever builds a house or a ship or forges a sacrificial chalice reveals what is to be brought forth…  This revealing gathers together in advance the aspect and the matter of the ship or house, with a view to the finished thing envisioned as completed… Thus what is decisive in techne does not lie at all in making and manipulating nor in the using of means, but rather in the aforementioned revealing.  It is as revealing, and not as manufacturing, that techne is a bringing forth.”[1]

In a similar sense the arts, as we understand them as rooted in and grasping firmly all the negative connotations of the ancient Greeks and Hebrews, are transformed through the death of Christ to be not “modifications of nature”, “infection by the foreign” nor “pale imitation”.  Instead the arts can be a revealing of the Kingdom, the making present of the sacred – the visible, audible and tactile example of how Creation can become sacramental.

Returning now to the notion of art in the modern sense, we can see in the radical separation between art and technology something akin to the detrimental aspects of techne observed by the ancients. On one hand Fine Art has become the place for individual volition and passions as well as an obscure language disconnected to any use. Contemporary art has gone so far in this direction, that even the more superficial uses of art, such as its decorative quality or its provoking an aesthetic experience is often put aside. Maybe the only thing left in the usefulness of Fine Art is its capacity to create prestige. On the other hand, technology has become, in quite the opposite direction of art, pure use without any sense of revealing. Technology is concerned only in efficiency, rapidity and its mercantile manufacturing of quantity. For does the inventor who creates a better microchip even ask himself what he is revealing, does he even care whether it will be used to make a better video game or a better missile? Even what could be somewhere in between, somewhere as a middle ground between the excesses of Fine Art and the mercantilism of technology, what we could call “design” has also been completely swallowed by both excess and mercantilism. Indeed modern design is no more an art of revealing than its counterparts, but is one only of eliciting desire through product and advertisement.

And so we must stop ourselves, those of us who pray. Being surrounded by this whirlwind of disordered passions, we must ask ourselves:  what then is the art, the techne appropriate to the Kingdom of God? Taking the entire liturgical life of the Church as our home, and looking to the Truth of the incarnation of God, we must ask ourselves each time we are “gathering the matter” around us, how it is that we are working towards the glory of God and to our own participation in that glory.

This is the journey which the Orthodox Arts Journal proposes to examine, explain, and expound, rejoicing in the best examples of Orthodox liturgical art. We will quickly see that form, ornament and material cannot be arbitrary, but rather all have symbolic and theological import in the making of holy things.

[1] Martin Heidegger, “The question Concerning Technology”.  p. 13  Translated by William Lovitt. Harper and Row.  1977



  1. PunkySil on June 9, 2012 at 10:25 am

    do you have a fb fanpage

  2. Laura on June 15, 2012 at 2:07 pm

    I’m coming late to this essay, having just found this journal. Thank you for addressing the arts in Orthodoxy! I look forward to reading more.

    I am especially intrigued by this: “Techne is a form of knowledge of principles that is turned toward doing. In the ancient world, art and craft (or technologies) were not separated the way they are now, but rather techne was a more encompassing notion that was attributed to any form of applied knowledge. As such, it was often opposed to episteme, which is “pure” knowledge. In certain respects it was looked down upon by the philosophers as a low form of imitation, a kind of “dead matter”.”

    If techne is, for all practical purposes, “doing” and episteme is, again for all practical purposes, “knowing” (in a pure sense), might this be at the core of the hyper-intellectualism found in Reformed and Calvinistic constructs? I ask this because it’s an important discussion in my Parish right now. We’ve recently had a sort of “mini-exodus” from a local Orthodox Presbyterian Church that prides itself on its highly intellectualized faith; being a member there is akin to having attended seminary! And the tension is often felt between those who do and those who know (i.e., mechanics vs engineers, for example). Where this is most evident is in the treatment of the arts (or lack thereof). Nice to look at, to hear, to entertain, but no practical value in the Kingdom of God since there is nothing intellectual about them; it’s all “fluff”…and worldly fluff at that.

    Of course, since modern Western art is all sturm und drang, storm and fury (“disorder passions” perfectly describes this), I agree to a large extent. But can it be that with Calvin’s rejection of the arts, particularly music, that the rift between techne and epistime became codified in the Protestant West? That an almost gnostic pursuit of “the oracles of God” (a Calvinistic expression) that decries matter as having worth became normative to the point that the Real Presence, iconography, music, and so on, took a back seat, at best, to the accumulation of pure knowledge and understanding…leading to the disordered way in which Western Man sees himself?

    Just some random thoughts as I’ve read this essay and thought about the years I spent in Reformed and Calvinistic circles as a trained musician…having been raised in a very artistic home.

    Again, thank you for this journal. Forgive my lack of scholarship; I do, however like to read.

    • Jonathan Pageau on June 15, 2012 at 10:33 pm

      Thank you for your comment. Although Episteme and Techne should not be too easily made into knowing and doing, since they are two modes of knowledge, I agree with your general point about Calvin. A close approximation of the type of difference there is between techne and episteme is in the Biblical (mostly in Proverbs) between Wisdom and Understanding. Wisdom is knowledge that comes from experience while understanding is knowledge that is theoretical or mental. It is not completely equivalent but it is close none the less.

      When looking at the Renaissance, the Reformation and what it opened for Europe, there is almost a permeating sense that something very basic was changing, that the very way in which we experience the world was being transformed. Calvin’s rational Christianity, his radical opposing of faith vs works is a fruit of that change. But we can see it happening all over the place, a “deincarnaton” if there is such a word. It is as if the very basic truth in Christianity, of the sacramental reality of the world, of unification of all things in Christ was being subverted. This will be even stronger in the puritan tradition where any “form” was seen as idolatry, as if Christ did not Himself have a body!

      some of the main results of this “deincarnation” process in Europe is both the physical sciences in the modern sense, but simultaneously the “speculative” spirituality one sees appearing during the Renaissance (and esp. the 17th century) with the proliferation of secret societies, spiritualists and the like.

      Orthodox like to blame specific people, usually Aquinas or Occam, for what happened to the west, but I think that is difficult. Whatever the source is, there is definitely a split and that split sadly still creates much of our perception of the world today.

  3. Macrina Lewis on June 18, 2012 at 9:57 pm

    Thanks for a thought-provoking introductory article. I especially liked learning about “aletheuein” and its philosophical understanding of “revealing.” When first studying iconography a teacher told me that drawing on the board by hand (not tracing) was important because it helped to bring the image out of the panel, to reveal it, if you will. She compared it to a sculptor finding his image in a piece of stone and revealing it through that medium. I think you are right that there is a theological component to the creation of liturgical art which is uniquely life-giving and spiritually penetrating.

    • Jonathan Pageau on June 18, 2012 at 11:07 pm

      It is actually a bit of a relief to read your comment. I was a bit hesitant in quoting Heidegger for the first article of an Orthodox Journal. I just felt he captured the notion so well and was very in tune with what I believe is an Orthodox experience of the arts. So now I know at least one person found that useful. Thanks, and I am looking forward to reading your future posts on the journal!

  4. Maxime le minime on June 26, 2012 at 5:49 am

    GREAT GREAT JOB ! Great way of tackling the problems of art today. This is my favorite concern because the practice – the making – the role and function of art is the heart of the correctness of the relation of man to the body of Christ. I thank you for this work.
    You can find my translation of your text here

  5. Fr Joseph Huneycutt on July 4, 2012 at 12:32 pm

    Please forgive a rather superficial question, but my daughter is intrigued with the icon. What is it called? Source?

    Thanking you in advance …

    • Jonathan Pageau on July 4, 2012 at 4:34 pm

      Thank you for your question, Fr. It is a lesser known western type called Christ the Geometer, from around the 12th and 13th century. It mostly appears in manuscripts.

  6. […] is a contributor to the Orthodox Arts Journal; see his article on The Recovery of the Arts   Part 1 and Part 2), which clearly expresses the mission of Hexaemeron. Also see his article on Armenian […]

  7. Orthodox Arts Journal on September 20, 2012 at 11:54 pm

    […] Arts (pt.3): Memory of the Heart September 20, 2012By Jonathan PageauThis is part 3 of a series:  Part 1, Part […]

  8. Orthodox Arts Journal on October 6, 2012 at 11:03 pm

    […] Recovery of the Arts (pt.2): From the Garden to the City July 23, 2012By Jonathan PageauMy first article in this series proposed a vision of the arts based on Old Testament, Greek and finally the Orthodox […]

Our Sponsors