A New Cathedral for Montenegro – Thoughts on the Architecture

By Andrew Gould on October 9, 2013
Cathedral of the Resurrection, Podgorica

Cathedral of the Resurrection, Podgorica

On Monday the primates and hierarchs of many nations gathered to consecrate a new cathedral in Podgorica, capital of Montenegro. Coverage of the grand event can be found on many news sites, but here I would like to reflect upon the building itself and its appointments.

Construction of the cathedral began in 1993. It is roughly 14,000 square feet and is a cathedral of the Serbian Orthodox Patriarchate. The architect, Dr. Predrag Ristic, is a towering figure in the Serbian church. Now in his 80s, he has built almost one hundred churches in his career, fourteen of which he saw destroyed in the wars of the 1990s. Ristic grew up in a Belgrade that was filled with artists from Imperial Russia. His family fought in the wars to liberate Thessaloniki from the Turks, and later suffered greatly due to their opposition to Communism. Ristic’s life has instilled in him a rare sense of purpose and determination in his service to God, a service that consists of undoing the damage of a century of war and unbelief.

Dr. Ristic says the following with respect to church architecture: “It is impossible to build a temple… without fasting, repentance, and the Descent of the Holy Spirit. Even then, the temple is not built, but comes down from heaven to earth, the same as the bread and wine of the Liturgy are no longer bread and wine, but the body and Blood of Christ… Therefore, the temple has to have perfect harmony characteristic of the Kingdom of Heaven, for only in such a space is it proper to place the icons and frescoes. This is an area that we prepare for the descent of the Holy Spirit and the coming of Christ. We welcome them as Abraham welcomed the Trinity at his table.” 1

Dr. Predrag Ristic

Dr. Predrag Ristic

The Cathedral of the Resurrection in Podgorica is certainly one of the most interesting Orthodox churches built in our times. Unlike other new cathedrals we have seen recently, the exterior does not seek to reflect High-Byzantine perfection. Rather, it is a charmingly eccentric design. It has the slightly awkward qualities of any real cathedral, expressing the cultural tensions between the high Imperial style and the capabilities of local craftsmen. The general form of the west front, with its twin towers and huge arch, is clearly modeled on the Cathedral of St. Tryphon in Kotor – a medieval monument that mixes Romanesque, Italianate, and Byzantine styles. Ristic took this distinctively Montenegrin style and gave it unexpected new life at the Podgorcia cathedral.

Cathedral of St. Tryphon, Kotor, Montenegro. Built 1166 and 1667.

Cathedral of St. Tryphon, Kotor, Montenegro. Built 1166 and 1667.

The exterior is built from rough blocks of white stone. The textures are typical of old Montenegrin churches, but here the roughness is startlingly exaggerated. If the whole building were so crude, it would almost look like a mockery. But the stone gets smoother as it goes up and then is richly carved with the most elegant fine details towards the top. Somehow it works, and it works very well. I cannot help but think that only a very old and accomplished architect would attempt such boldness!

There are other eccentricities to the design. The rough blocks of stone at the foundation have several icons carved into them. The icons are haphazardly located, appearing almost like the unauthorized work of a graffiti sculptor. It seems almost impossible that these carvings could coexist with the rough stone around them and with the refined Byzantine ornament high above, and yet, again, it works. Another peculiarity is the seven rooftop crosses. They vary not only in style, but even in orientation.

img_4667 img_4665f

The interior is a grand and complex space appropriate to the large scale of the church. It is richly ornamented with marble floors, murals, and furnishings. Unfortunately, this interior scheme does not have the same medievalist charm as the exterior. The iconographic murals have a gold background – a practice that was fashionable in Russia circa 1900. It is an odd choice for this rough stony church, as the murals seem too precious and delicate for the architecture. The central chandelier also looks late-Russian, and is aggressive and unlovely in form. A medieval choros of Serbian style would have worked much better. It seems doubtful that Dr. Ristic was responsible for some of these interior choices.


The Podgorica cathedral is a rare example of a new church that truly reflects local traditions and history. It is perhaps even more remarkable in that it offers some new and innovative ideas that are completely harmonious with tradition. There are some elements in the stonework that, in another context, would be seen as modernistic. And yet this building as a whole has not the slightest hint of modernism. It is an entirely medievalist vision, but it has boldness and deliberate imperfection – traits that are now common in modernist architecture and regrettably rare in traditional architecture.

1) Remarks made by Dr. Ristic in Sydney, Australia, in 1996. From: www.svetosavlje.org (Translation by Andrew Gould)


img_4886 img_4713 img_4679 img_4675 img_4661f img_4640fimg_4929

Posted in


  1. James Cooper on October 9, 2013 at 5:00 pm

    Wow! ‘Nuff said.

  2. Fr Ivan Moody on October 9, 2013 at 5:24 pm

    It is wonderful. A shining example of creativity within tradition.

  3. Redwan Ruben Elias on October 10, 2013 at 11:26 pm

    I will come into thy house in the multitude of thy mercy: and in the fear I will worship toward the holy temple. Lead me, oh Lord, in thy righteousness because of mine enemies; make the way straight before me, that with a clear mind I may glorify thee forever, One Divine Power worshipped in three person: AFTHER, SON, AND HOLY SPIRIT
    May the LORD preserve the beauty of thy house, now and ever and unto ages of ages, AMEN.

  4. Redwan Ruben Elias on October 10, 2013 at 11:28 pm


  5. Fr David Bird on October 11, 2013 at 11:57 am

    What a wonderful building!! Creativity within Tradition!!

  6. Richard Barrett on October 15, 2013 at 8:53 pm

    Andrew — should you ever find your way back to Indiana, perhaps this might be of interest to you: http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/gallery?Avis=BG&Dato=20131015&Kategori=OPINION21&Lopenr=310150042&Ref=PH&nclick_check=1

  7. Emi Parker on October 16, 2013 at 11:11 am

    I’d love see more of Dr. Ristic’s work and writings on church architecture. Can you recommend additional English resources on him? (Or could you write more posts on these topics? Very much enjoyed this post and your thoughts on Ristic’s work!)

    • Andrew Gould on October 18, 2013 at 4:57 pm

      I wish I could. What little information I could find I had to translate from Serbian. If there is anyone out there with more information about Ristic’s churches, please send it to me!

  8. Christopher D.H. Row on October 21, 2013 at 2:33 pm

    A parcel-gilt variation of your Holy Ascension chorus would have looked wonderful in that space, Andrew. What a remarkably timeless — and yet completely original — building! The mark of a great architect in all times and places.

  9. Joaco on October 29, 2013 at 10:38 pm

    As a Roman Catholic, all I can think is: why did we decide to give up this beauty?! I don’t understand. Dear Orthodox brothers, please pray for Christian unity. We need tradition back!

  10. Lisa on November 3, 2013 at 2:08 am

    It is truly beautiful. Praise God and give him the glory.

Our Sponsors